Card Carrying Indians vs Those Who Don’t

In the Indian world, those who have BIA “cards” are considered “real Indians” and those who don’t, aren’t.  It’s a sad commentary, really, because it draws a line in the sand and actively, systematically encourages both discrimination and the eventual elimination of Indian tribes, well, of government sanctioned Indian tribes, as we know them.  Why?  Because unless the tribal members “marry native,” eventually, their blood quantum, the percentage of Indian blood they carry, will be reduced to under the amount required for tribal membership, a percentage established by the tribes themselves.  Then there won’t be issues about obtaining that precious BIA card from the government that identifies them as “Indian,” and entitles them to a number of services, because there won’t be any more “Indians.”  They, along with the BIA who issues the cards, will have legislated themselves into the group of “have nots,” the “not real” Indians that the card carrying Indians so often disdain.  Indeed, the line in the sand that includes/excludes the BIA card and tribal membership encourages discrimination both inside of and outside of the Native community.

I have often wondered if this is just another kind of long-term institutionalized genocide, one that Native people and tribes have bought into in order to obtain the services today that their people need.  In time, the “Indians” will be gone, in another generation or two, which was, after all, the original intention of the government – to exterminate the Indians one way or another – through death, sale into slavery, religious conversion, assimilation – anything to make them non-Indian and to “go-away,” of course, leaving their precious land behind.  By the tribes’ own definition of who is and is not an Indian, they will shrink their own numbers until they become extinct or so small as to be inconsequential.  So the government doesn’t have to do anything, except wait, because the “shrinking” criteria for being “Indian” has been established and agreed to by all parties involved.

Why, you ask, wouldn’t the Indian tribes simply change their definition of blood quantum to include more people?  That is a political question, and the answer even moreso, but in essence, there is a pot of money, often including casino revenue, and the pot must be divided by the number of tribal members.  Some tribes have actually tightened their membeship requirements.

Warren Petoskey, a card-carrying member of the Little Bay Band of Odawa Indians writes about card carrying versus excluded Indians in Native News Network from a first-hand perspective.  He is card-carrying, number 0322, but his wife is not.  Take a look.

From another perspective, and for an example of what the BIA and Oklahoma Cherokee tribal membership cards look like, see John Cornsilk’s webpage.

Advertisements

About Roberta Estes

Scientist, author, genetic genealogist. Documenting Native Heritage through contemporaneous records and DNA.
This entry was posted in Bureau of Indian Affairs, CDIB Card. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Card Carrying Indians vs Those Who Don’t

  1. Margaret (Speaks) Waters says:

    Curious, does that mean Obama isn’t African American then? My husbands mom was half Cherokee and I still consider him of native american blood. Just wondering.

  2. Clayton says:

    Great post by Roberta and article by Warren Petoskey. It appears the BIA governed tribal members do not comprehend that they are wards of the state, and not of our Creator. Sad but true.

  3. Rhonda says:

    Pardon me if I’m out of place, but are those card-carrying Natives angry with the non-card carrying Natives because their ancestors were not able to “fly under the radar” so to speak during the forced removal of the 1800’s ?

  4. Paulette says:

    Not only is this true, but because my Great-grandparent’s were slaves and taken away from their tribes, I cannot claim my Native heritage. My understanding is that if I do not have enough percentage of blood of a particular tribe or reservation, I cannot have a number or “card”. It is dismaying to me that I cannot be a part of a culture that I am not only proud off but that I feel in my core to be a part off. Please know that all the perks are fine and good but my love and pride of finally being recognized as a “Native American” is all i’ve ever wanted.

  5. Pingback: Thanksgiving Conundrum | Native Heritage Project

  6. Pingback: Thanksgiving Conundrum | DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy

  7. Thomas Singingcrow Smith, Caddo/Cherokee says:

    To those who KNOW that their family/ancestors are/were American Indian, should not fret about anyone telling them they are not real Indian. You are Indian even if the government says you are not.

  8. Adam says:

    I’m not too worried about card-carrying vs. non-card carrying. My best friend is 1/4 EBCI, and is not enrolled. No one would ever tell him he’s not Indian.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s