Native Americans in the Carolina Borderlands, A Critical Ethnography by Michael Spivey

I’ve read a lot of books on the topic of Native people.  When I say a lot, I mean hundreds, if not thousands.  Some are reference books.  Some are histories or record stories.  And then, there is the cream of the crop.

I will, from time to time, discuss a book here.  Native Americans in the Carolina Borderlands, A Critical Ethnography by Michael Spivey is an exceptional book.  For genealogists looking for surnames, this isn’t that type of book, although there are certainly some surnames imbedded in the chapters.

This book is about the culture and the lives of historical Indians in what I’ve been calling the Lumbee/PeeDee River basin.  Today’s tribes have names, and in some places have reservations, but historically, a lot of blending occurred and the lines between tribes, between neighborhoods and between different peoples was often blurred.  That is certainly the case in this borderlands region.

In this book, Michael focuses on the PeeDee Tribe’s home area in Marlboro, Dillon and Marion Counties, in South Carolina.  These are adjacent the North Carolina border and face Robeson, Columbus and Scotland Counties in North Carolina which you might recognize as the primary region of the Lumbee.  There was obviously no toll gate at the border to keep people on their own side of that political state line.

Michael Spivey was raised in this part of SC, and as an adult came back to document the plight of the current generations, their struggle for recognition as a Native group of people and as a tribe, and to unearth as much as possible about their history, as a group and as families (genealogy). 

Regardless of which “tribe” in this region you are interested in, this book discusses the cultural and social issues that have affected all people “of color” and those who were of “mixed blood,” both today and in the past.

In essence, Michael takes us along with him on his journey of discovery and awakening.  This book is well worth the read.  It is included on the Fundamental Research List.

Please note that these reviews are entirely indepenent.  I do not receive any compensation, the book is not free (purchased online) and the authors are not aware that their book is being reviewed.

Posted in South Carolina | Leave a comment

The Powhatan Confederacy, Past and Present by James Mooney

The Powhatan are the Indians that lived near and surrounding Jamestown.  Those same Indians claim to have killed the surviving Lost Colonists about 1607, the Colonistshaving joined with a Chesapeake Tribe after being left on Roanoke Island in 1587.  Of course, we don’t know if they actually did, or they simply told the Jamestown settlers that story to invoke fear. 

James Mooney (1861-1921), was an ethnographer who lived for many years among the Cherokee, documented the Tidewater, Southeastern and Great Plains tribes.  For his time, he was considered the foremost expert on Native Americans.  Had it not been for his perspective and his work, much of what is known today would not have been  preserved.  We own James Mooney a very large debt of gratitude.

You can read more about his life at this link:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Mooney

Several of his texts have been digitized and are available online.

Most of his articles were published in the bulletins of the US Bureau of Ethnology.  The Powhatan Confederacy bulletin is available online and free. 

The Powhatan Confederacy, Past and Present James Mooney                                     American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Jan. – Mar., 1907), pp. 129-152

The map below, from his article, shows the range of the Powhatan Confederacy.  The yellow circles indicate the location of the bands existing at the time he wrote the article which was published in 1907.

One of the things I had always wondered is why the Powhatan Confederacy fell apart after the death of Powhatan in 1618 and then the death of his brother Opchanacanough who was killed by the European settlers in 1646.  Many other tribal groups have survived the deaths of many Chiefs, the Iroquois to the North and the Tuscarora to the South being prime examples in the same time period.

Mooney addresses this, although is an indirect manner, but when I read what he said, I realized he was right, and it made sense.  Powhatan ruled by complete authority, intimidation and fear – by attacking others, even villages of his own tribe and within his confederation, while the Iroquois and Tuscarora (also Iroquoian) rule by consensus. 

At the end of Mooney’s paper, which was published in 1907, he provided a “current” update on several tribes, or as he calls them, remnant tribes, that were part of the Powhatan Confederacy, specifically, the Pamunkey, the Mattapony, the Chickahominy, the Nansemond and a few other small bands.  The smaller bands have no names are mostly family groups. All reside in Virginia.

One group of about 40 people resides on the Mattapony River in King William County and consists of family names of Adams and Holmes.  Another is found on the Rappahannock River in Essex Co. with the surname of Nelson.  A third is found at the head of the Pocoson River in York County sporting the family name of Wise.  A fourth is on the York River in Gloucester County and descends from the Sampson family.  Lastly, a few mixed-bloods were living on the Eastern Shore, near Accomac Courthouse (Drummondtown) in Accomac County, with no family names listed and a few families with the Miles surname near Fisher’s Inlet in southern Northampton County.

Hat tip to Elaine for sending me the link to this document!

Posted in Chickahominy, Mattapony, Nansemond, Pamunkey, Powhatan | 10 Comments

Evolution of Native Names – the Shaw Family in Michigan

Michigan’s Native people did not bear the full force of early contact with Europeans.  Many Native people were still living in Michigan, in their tribal units, speaking their own language, in the 1800s, even into the late 1800s and early 1900s.  Records do exist, in many cases, which allow us to take a look at the evolution of Native names.

When I’m working with the WWI draft records, and I see a grouping of names, I always know I have a family unit of some type and it’s not an aberration.  When I see three or four people, scattered between counties, I always wonder why.  Here’s an example using the Shaw family

WWI Draft Registration Cards – 1917-1918 – registered as Indian

 Adam Shaw b 1886 registered Lake Co., Mi.

 John Thomas Shaw b 1890 Mi registered Baraga Co., Mi.

 Aaron James Shaw b 1891 Mi registered Manistee Co., Mi.

These names are very similar.  They may or may not be a derivative of Shaw. 

 In Emmet Co., Mi.

Amos Mathew Shawa b 1884

Frank Shawan b 1882

I wanted to take a look at the various records that we do have to see what can be discovered about this surname.  Whatever lessons or trends we find can probably generally be applied to Native surnames in general.

Looking at the land allotment records from 1887, we can see that the surname Shaw was already in use then, in several counties among the Native people.  However, we can also see that Shaw was a portion of several other names spoken in the Native tongue.  It’s certainly possible that Shaw became a surname because it was part or all of a Native name and Shaw became the anglicized version.

Several land allotment records from this link are shown below.

http://www.mainlymichigan.com/nativedata/LandAllotments/Land.aspx

MI3210__.389 SHAW ADDISON C 10/22/1870 389 018N – 016W W½NW¼ 32 Mason General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3260__.406 SHAW ISAAC 5/27/1871   015N – 003W NW¼NW¼ 14 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.088 SHAW JAMES 5/27/1871   015N – 004W W½SE¼ 11 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.092 SHAW JOHNSON 5/27/1871   015N – 004W SW¼NW¼ 11 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.033 SHAW JULIA 5/27/1871   016N – 003W SW¼SE¼ 35 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3240__.130 SHAW MARY 5/21/1873 1426 047N – 003W SE¼SW¼ 13 Chippewa General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3240__.130 SHAW MARY 5/21/1873 1426 047N – 003W SE¼NE¼ 15 Chippewa General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.147 SHAW MARY 8/20/1872   015N – 003W SW¼NE¼ 10 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
958555 SHAW WILLIAM 04/30/1925 180 051N – 032W N½NE¼ 21 Baraga General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3240__.122 SHAW WILLIAM 5/21/1873 1418 047N – 003W E½NW¼ 13 Chippewa General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.303 SHAW WILLIAM 5/27/1871   015N – 005W S½NW¼ 11 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3290__.014 SHAW WILLIAM 5/27/1871   015N – 004W E½SW¼ 11 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3300__.236 SHAW WILLIAM 12/14/1874   015N – 004W E½SW¼ 11 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.187 SHAW BAN GE ZHICK ELIZA 8/20/1872   015N – 003W NE¼SW¼ 21 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.465 SHAW BAW DAY   8/20/1872   016N – 003W NE¼NW¼ 35 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.457 SHAW BAW DEECE   5/27/1871   016N – 003W SW¼NE¼ 9 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.061 SHAW BAW SE GAY QUAY   8/20/1872   014N – 003W SW¼SE¼ 10 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.358 SHAW BAY QUOM SARAH 8/20/1872   016N – 003W NW¼NW¼ 18 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3220__.415 SHAW BE CO SHING   1/13/1872 915 042N – 002W E½SW¼ 7 Mackinac General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3220__.306 SHAW BE GWAN SOPHIA 1/13/1872 806 037N – 006W SE¼NE¼ 12 Emmet General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.300 SHAW BE NAY   5/27/1871   015N – 005W S½SE¼ 10 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3230__.210 SHAW BE QUAM DAVID 6/26/1872 1210 031N – 011W SE¼SW¼ 23 Leelanau General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3210__.162 SHAW BE QUO UM   10/22/1870 162 015N – 016W SE¼SW¼ 25 Oceana General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.233 SHAW BE QUO UM MATHEW 5/27/1871   015N – 004W E½NW¼ 29 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3260__.210 SHAW BE QUO UM THOMAS 5/27/1871   014N – 005W SE¼NE¼ 17 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3270__.006 SHAW BE QUO UM THOMAS 5/27/1871   015N – 003W E½SW¼ 35 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3210__.253 SHAW BE QUO UNG MOSES 10/22/1870 253 016N – 016W S½NW¼ 21 Oceana General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3280__.051 SHAW BE QUON ELIZABETH 8/20/1872   014N – 003W NW¼NE¼ 3 Isabella General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3240__.103 SHAW BE YEA PETER 5/21/1873 1399 048N – 002E SW¼NW¼ 34 Chippewa General Allotments Feb. 8 1887 – Dawes Act
MI3240__.103 SHAW BE YEA PETER

The Durant Rolls from 1870/1908 returned 10 pages of names that included the word “shaw.”  Both the name Shaw and Shawan were shown.

http://www.mainlymichigan.com/nativedata/DurantRoll/Default.aspx

51 5 6437 SHAW ADAM         23 Grand River M   CHIPPEWA LAKE STATION Osceola    
60 12 HOF SHAW ADDISON C           Grand River       Unknown    
5 25 3828 SHAW CLARA           Sault Ste. Marie F   BRIMLEY Chippewa    
5 8 5913 SHAW CLARISSA         61 Sault Ste. Marie F     Unknown    
20 40 6116 SHAW EDWARD       6114 12 Traverse M   CROSS VILLAGE Emmet    
5 25 5858 SHAW FRANCES       5856 6 Sault Ste. Marie F   L’ANSE Baraga    
5 25 5914 SHAW FRANK         24 Sault Ste. Marie M   OSHKOSH, WISCONSIN Out of State    
20 40 6115 SHAW IDA       6114 15 Traverse F   CROSS VILLAGE Emmet    
1 1 5855 SHAW JACOB         35 Sault Ste. Marie M   ODANAH, WISCONSIN Out of State    
5 25 5856 SHAW JULIA         33 Sault Ste. Marie F CRANE – maiden L’ANSE Baraga    
51 5 6438 SHAW LIZZIE         16 Grand River F   MT PLEASANT SCHOOL Isabella    
5 25 5857 SHAW LOUIS       5856 13 Sault Ste. Marie M   L’ANSE Baraga    
5 25 HOF SHAW LOUIS           Sault Ste. Marie       Unknown    
20 40 6114 SHAW REGINA         35 Traverse F ODEIMIN – maiden CROSS VILLAGE Emmet    
5 25 5859 SHAW SARAH       5856 4 Sault Ste. Marie F   L’ANSE Baraga    
5 8 5912 SHAW SUSAN         63 Sault Ste. Marie F   SAULT STE MARIE Chippewa    
5 8 HOF SHAW THOMAS           Sault Ste. Marie       Unknown    
5 18 HOF SHAW WILLIAM           Sault Ste. Marie       Unknown    
8 5 4851 SHAWAN ANGELINE 4850       50 Sault Ste. Marie F OSAYWAWMICK – married DRUMMOND ISLAND Chippewa    
8 5 5094 SHAWAN CECELIA           Sault Ste. Marie F PINE – married GARDEN RIVER, CANADA Unknown    
20 21 6092 SHAWAN FRANCIS     6090 6091 26 Traverse M   CROSS VILLAGE Emmet    
20 39 6092 SHAWAN FRANCIS     6090 6091 26 Traverse M   CROSS VILLAGE Emmet    

From the records above, and the list of Halfbreeds, below, it looks like we might well have several sources for the eventual surname Shaw.  One source could indeed be a European male, given that the name appears on the list of halfbreeds.  Several native names inclusive of the word or syllable shaw could have evolved into the surname Shaw.  Only DNA testing would tell us definitively how many sources we have for this surname and this could potentially be affected by matrilineal naming practices.  Regardless of the genesis, it’s apparent that Shaw was a very early Ottawa/Chippewa name in Michigan.

Looking at the 1836 list of Halfbreed Ottawa and Chippewa, we find Shaw there as well.

https://nativeheritageproject.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post-new.php

110 Shaw Thomas   1   33 Sault Ste. Marie 33 1/2 Chippewa Admitted 305.89 Thomas Shaw Near relation of the chief at Ste. Marie
111 Shaw Mary   1   30 Sault Ste. Marie 15 1/2 Chippewa Admitted 305.89 Thomas Shaw Wife of Thomas Shaw & related to one of the sub chiefs
112 Shaw William   1   6 Sault Ste. Marie 6 1/2 Chippewa Admitted 305.89 Thomas Shaw Child of Nos. 110 & 111
113 Shaw Sarah   1   2 Sault Ste. Marie 2 1/2 Chippewa Admitted 305.89 Thomas Shaw Child of Nos. 110 & 111
Posted in Chippewa, Michigan, Military, Ottawa | Leave a comment

Deserters and the Revolutionary War

Deserter.  Not a word we want to see beside the name of our ancestor.  But desertion meant something a little different then than it does now.  Most of the time, desertion was not to the enemy side.  Most men just went home for awhile to tend to the crops, plant them, or harvest them.  Many records show the men later rejoining their units.  No one seemed to think much of it.

The soldiers of the Continental Army were not professionals.  Many were men who were in their local militias which would be called into service for 30 or 60 days or until whatever problem was solved.  They treated the “War” the same way they treated their militia unit.

John Harrold, although not Native, provides us with a typical example.  Up to 25% of the men who served were at some point considered to have been deserters.  That did not seem to affect their later pensions or qualifications for bounty land.

Fold3 at  www.fold3.com has recently brought the Revolutionary War pay slips online.  These slips were typically completed monthly, or periodically, for each soldier.  Of course, actually getting paid was another matter entirely.  The government ran out of money and that is why eventually bounty land was given to veterans, in lieu of pay.

John Harrold’s RW pay records:

  • Served in the late Capt. Williams company of the 8th Va regiment commanded by Col. James Wood
  • July 1779 Camp Rampo – enlisted Mary 1 1777 for 3 years

Each one of the pay records shows this he enlisted at this date which is how you can be sure it’s the same man.  Pay slips were included as follows:

  • Aug 1779 – Camp Smith
  • Oct 1779 Camp Ramapough
  • April 1779 Camp Middlebrook
  • Deserted July 1778, joined April 17, 1779
  • April 1779 – 3 days pay – not drawn for since June 78
  • March 1779 – Capt Smith’s Clove
  • June 1779 – Capt Smiths’ Clove
  • Not dated – Capt. Wallace’s company – absent

John was absent from July of 1778 until in April of 1779, and no one seemed to care.  There seemed to be no punishment for having been gone.  They were very probably glad for the reinforcements when he returned.

One problem with the War was that states were desperate for recruits, and offered bounties and land, both, upon enlistment.  But the catch was that you had to enlist for 3 years.  Some men joined, deserted and then went to another state to join.  But most men, they simply went home for a visit to take care of what needed to be done.  When they were ready, they returned to their unit, and resumed their pay status as of the date they returned.

Posted in Military | 1 Comment

Ne-Do-Ba – Gwilodwogan (Wabanaki People)

Did you get that?  Not a word huh.  Well, that’s because it’s not English. 

Nancy LeCompte, the Research and Education Director for the Ne-Do-Ba contacted me and shared her wonderful blog.  the Ne-Do-Ba are Wabanaki people.  Wabanaki translates loosely as “Dawnland,” meaning the first to see the sun each morning.  You can read more about these people at this link.  http://www.nedoba.blogspot.com/p/about-this-blog.html and on the organization’s homepage at this link: http://www.nedoba.org/

There is also a Wabanaki timeline here:  http://www.nedoba.blogspot.com/2011/02/wabanaki-timeline.html

Information about the historic Wabanaki people here: http://www.nedoba.blogspot.com/2011/02/historic-wabanaki-people.html

These people lived in Maine, New Hampshie, Vermont, New Brunswick (Canada), Nova Scotia and parts of Quebec.  The following modern-day tribes are descendants of the Wabanaki:

  • Penobscot
  • Pasamaquoddy
  • Maliseet
  • Mi’Kmaq (also spelled Micmac and other variants)
  • Abenaki or Odanak
  • Abenaki of Wolinak

According to Nancy’s blog, GWILODWÔGAN is a word from the Western Abenaki dialect which refers to exploration, research, or investigation.  That’s what her blog is doing. 

One of the challenges faced by Native researchers is to sort our the truth and what is actually documented from oral history, bad genealogy and sometimes just wishful thinking.  What Nancy is doing is using accepted Genealogical Proof Standards, which by the way, does not allow for “preponderance of evidence.”  She takes each family she is working on and documents the research approach and the results.  You can see many of them at this link: http://www.nedoba.blogspot.com/p/about-this-blog.html

Not only are these wonderful for the families involved, they are excellent step by step examples of how to do this type of genealogical/historical research.  I’ll certainly be adding these surnames, and these links, to the Native Names document.

I had to wonder, where did Nancy start with this research?  I found the answer in one of her blog postings, quoted below:

“In 1898, a number of Indian tribes from New York joined together for the purpose of suing the U.S. Government. The suit involved a broken treaty (imagine that).  Not only did they win the right to sue, they actually won the case and were awarded a sum of money as compensation.  The money was to be distributed amongst the members of the tribes (including the Brothertown Tribe).

In order to properly distribute the money, the government requested individuals fill out applications to prove they had a right to settlement distributions. These applications are an incredible source of genealogical information.”

I guess this is the only good news about broken treaties….for genealogists, they provide those all important breadcrumbs.  I’ve love to have that treaty list of Native people for my Native Names project!!

Nancy – keep up the good work and thank you so much for sharing.

Posted in Abenaki, Canada, Maine, Maliseet, Micmac, New Hampshire, New York, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Treaty, Vermont, Wabanaki | 3 Comments

White Deer – Ghosts of the Forests

White deer are near and dear to my heart.  In Michigan, deer are everywhere.  There has been a population explosion in the past 20 to 30 years.  About 10 years ago, I nearly wrecked my car about two miles away from home.  A large white buck stepped out from the woods.  He wasn’t in the road, yet, but I had never seen a white deer.  He was stunning and majestic, a sight to behold.  I was sick when I heard through the local grapevine that a hunter thought so too.  What the hunter didn’t know, and should have, was about the $1000 fine and the fact that they confiscate the deer….so no white deer antlers hanging above his fireplace.

Native people took the names of nature around them.  We find many White Deer families, not in Michigan, but in the Dakotas and in Oklahoma as well.  White deer are found from Maryland, through New York and Pennsylvania, into Michigan and as far south as Texas.  Some are freckled, on the east coast, but here, they are either dark or white, and nothing in-between.

White deer played a part in Native stories and legends as well.  They have been part of our habitat, it seems, for a very long time, certainly before contact with Europeans.  Early European explorers talked about them in their journals.

A Chickasaw legend can be read here:  http://www.ilhawaii.net/~stony/lore128.html

The legend of the white deer has even permeated the Lost Colony mystery.  Sir Walter Raleigh left over 100 people on Roanoke Island in 1587 to establish a colony.  The first child was born that August, Virginia Dare.  The colony was abandoned, unintentionally, by England, and three years later, the colony had moved, apparently joining the Indians on Hatteras Island.  A hurricane descended on the rescue party, blowing them back to England, and that is the last we know, for sure, of the Lost Colonists.  However, in Native legends, the white deer is said to be Virginia Dare.  You can read more about the Lost Colony saga and ongoing research to find the original colonist families in England and their descendants here at www.lostcolonyresearch.org.

If you’d like to see a short video from Wisconsin Public Television about the white deer, it’s lovely and well worth your time, click here: http://wpt2.org/npa/iw20090326whiteDeer.cfm

Posted in Chickasaw, Lost Colony, Michigan, Wisconsin | Leave a comment

Bet Ya Can’t Pick Just One….Name that is

Oh, my head hurts.  I’m busy transcribing away, working on the Massachusetts Indians who served in the Revolutionary War.  And then I find Joseph Nicholas Hawwawas.

A long time ago, I learned that when I look at a record and think to myself, “my, that’s interesting,” a little neon light should start flashing in my brain, because one day, I will need to remember why this is interesting, and it will make much more sense.  Well, I looked at Joseph Nicholas Hawwawas and I thought, a middle name, now isn’t that interesting. 

Middle names weren’t even in use at this time for European men.  When I see someone’s family tree and it has a middle name at this time, unless it’s a rare circumstance where it’s a last name being used as a middle name, I know that someone has gotten bad information and it causes me to suspect the accuracy of the tree. 

If European men hadn’t yet taken middle names, surely Indian men who were just beginning to, in some cases, adopt anglicized names at all, wouldn’t have a middle name.  After all, this is 1780, not 1920. 

And then I read the rest of his entry – the small print – and it said:

Joseph Nicholas Hawwawas, Indian, pension references father and son as having service under numerous names including Nicholas Hawas, Nicholas Ovas, Joseph Nicholas, Capt. Nichols and Nicholas Hawwawhas, but did not clarify the service performed by each man under these names.  Oh yes, and there is another entry for a Nicholas Hawwawas too, who was a Lieutenant.  Was he yet a different man.  He lived in Perry, Maine, but served in Massachusetts.  But that’s not all….yet another Nicholas Hawwawas who was a St. John’s Indian living in St. John’s Maine. 

Oh, my head hurts.  Not only is Joseph Nicholas Hawwawas not one man, but two, three or four, he, or they, have between them 6 separate names, a total of 7 different parts, not counting Captain, which was often used as a first name for Native people in that timeframe and two ranks.  And these are just the names recorded in the documents found by the DAR.  How many more names did they use?  How many more times are they recorded under different names?

And of course, this leads me to ask more difficult and uncomfortable questions.  How many names did other Native people use?  How many of these families look to be extinct today, but are humming right along with a completely different surname.  And how would we ever connect those dots?

I know that in some cases, surnames changed, but when did the concept of surnames, meaning you pick one, and you keep it and you pass it down paternally, generationally, actually become widespread among the Indians?  I would have expected to see this pattern by the time of the Revolutionary War on the eastern seaboard, especially the heavily settled areas.  By this time the Native people had been living with and among the Europeans for more than 170 years, AND, they were fighting WITH and FOR them, unlike their brethren further removed to the west (who were fighting against the Americans) who one would not expect to be nearly so Europeanized.  But, clearly, in some cases, and perhaps in more cases than we care to think about, this just isn’t true.

Will the real Joseph Nicholas Hawwawas, Nicholas Hawas, Nicholas Ovas, Joseph Nicholas, Capt. Nichols, or Nicholas Hawwawhas please stand up and state your name, for the record?

Hello, my name is Nicholas Hawwawas and this is my brother Nicholas and my other brother Nicholas…..:)

Posted in Massachusetts, Names | 3 Comments

Massachusetts Indians in the Revolutionary War

Each state in the DAR Forgotten Patriot’s book is arranged separately.  Quite a bit of history of both African and Native Americans relative to the war is given.  About 1700 total people of color were found to have served out of approximately 68,000 Massachusetts soldiers. 

The Indians in Massachusetts were broken into two groups. Most were small tribal groups, members of the Wampanoag Confederation, on the east coast near Cape Cod, but another group of over 200 Stockbridge Indians lived near Stockbridge in western Massachusetts.  The Stockbridge were Mahican Indians. Both the Wampanoag tribes and the Stockbridge were Algonquian language speakers. 

After the alarm was given at Lexington on April 19, 1775 a committee of the Provincial Congress was instructed “to pay the sum of 23 pounds….to be employed in purchasing a number of blankets and some ribbons which they are to present to the Indians enlisted.”  A few days later, Capt. Solomon Uhhaunauwanumt, Chief sachem of the Stockbridge Indians, expressed a position favorable to the Americans in a lengthy address to the Provincial Congress.  At the end of the war, more than half of his tribe would be dead, and those who survived were mostly widows.

In order to encourage Indian participation, Henries Vomhavi, an Indian, was allowed to keep a little horse which he had taken during skirmished at Noddles Island near Boston. 

The Indians did fight with the Americans, but they paid dearly.  In May 1775, Abraham Nimham, a Stockbridge Indian, was paid for carrying a message.  In October 1777, it was instructed that 200 dollars be paid to Abraham Nimham and his companions “as an acknowledgement for their zeal in the cause of the United States.”  It’s unclear whether this is “pay” or a bonus.  However, Abraham is the “old sachem” that, along with a young chief, Nimham, was brutally murdered by the British in a skirmish near Kingsbridge, NY on Aug. 31, 1778.  A total of 30 Indians died that day and many more were wounded.

The Indians did not necessarily serve close to home.  A unit in Berkshire County included some men from Stockbridge and also Mashpee Indians from Barnstable County, at the other end of the state. 

The Mashpee and Stockbridge suffered heavy losses.  Reverend Gideon Hawley, minister to the Mashpee, stated in 1783 that “at that time, there were no less than 70 widows on the plantation.  Most of the widows had lost their husbands during the war.”

By the end of the war, more than half the Stockbridge Indians were dead.  In 1785, the survivors migrated to the Oneida reservation in New Stockbridge, NY.  On Dec. 2, 1794, those survivors were parties to a treaty with the United States which was made as payment for the services of the Indians during the war.  The treaty granted the Stockbridge, Oneida and Tuscarora Indians 5000 dollars, to be divided among the three groups.  It also provided that a sawmill, a gristmill and a church be built in the country of the Oneidas. 

The Revolutionary War nearly obliterated the Indian population in Massachusetts between deaths during the war and subsequent removals.  However, as we see in later records, not everyone removed or died.  A few stayed in their native homelands, mostly near Cape Cod. where they became the ancestors of the Mashpee tribe today.  The Mashpee obtained federal recognition in 2007.  You can read more about them at this link:  http://mashpeewampanoagtribe.com/

Tribes listed by name as having at least one tribal member serve from Massachusetts in the Revolutionary War were;

  • Nipmuc
  • Mashpee
  • Penobscot
  • Punkapoag/Poncapoag
  • Stockbridge

In the Massachusetts records, as compared to the records from Maine and the states further north, there are a great deal of records that indicate admixture.  Often these say “mulatto” or “mixed” but they never say what is mixed with what.  In some cases, I could make an educated guess based on the surname or the location, but without documentation, it’s only that, so I have not listed anyone in the names document who wasn’t noted as Indian in the Forgotten Patriots document.

Posted in Mashpee, Massachusetts, Oneida, Stockbridge, Tuscarora, Wampanoag | Leave a comment

Maine Indians and the Revolutionary War

I’m working my way through the DAR’s wonderful resource, Forgotten Patriots: African American and American Indian Patriot in the Revolutionary War.  These names of course are all going on the Native Names document. 

The DAR has separated their research into states, and I’ll be summarizing as I go along.

In Maine, which was at the time of the Revolutionary War, part of Massachusetts, the goal was to balance British influence among the Indians and keep them neutral.  To this end, the Massachusetts Provincial Congress addressed the Penobscot Tribe in May of 1775.

The St. John’s and Micmac tribes sent a letter to the Council, joining their brothers, the Penobscot Indians and declared to the Americans: “We are Brothers  of One Father and God made us all, and we will stand by you, as long as the Almighty will give us strength, and we hope you will do the same for us.”

This does not mean that the British stopped trying to recruit the Indians of course, but the Indians did indeed fight alongside the Americans. 

The final great military action in the north took place in July of 1779 with an expedition to Penobscot which involved the Penobscot Indian unit.  A monument on Indian Island in Old Town, Maine was erected by the Bango Chapter of the DAR in 1910 to commemorate the support of the Penobscot tribe.

The DAR document sums the situation up in their final introductory paragraph:

“In the final days of the Revolution, attention of the governing bodies was far from Maine.  When the peace negotiations took place, the hopes of a St. Johns’ River border were dashed as all of the land north of the St. Croix River went to Canada.  Maine remained the home of only remnants of two of the tribes who supported the American cause.  The Penobscots have a reservation at Indian Island, Old Town, Maine and the Passamaquoddy Tribal Reservation is near Perry, Maine.  Few Indians received Federal pensions or any proper compensation for their sacrifices.”

In the list of Maine Patriots, we find Indians from the following tribes:

  • St. John’s Indians
  • Maliseet Indians
  • Passamoquoddy Indians
  • Micmac Indians
  • Penobscot Indians
  • Mohawk Indians
  • Canawango Indian
Posted in Canawango, Maine, Maliseet, Micmac, Mohawk, Passamoquoddy, Penobscot, St. John's Indians | 4 Comments

New York Indian Reservations

How things change in a little under 100 years.  In the WWI draft, literally hundreds of men were registered on New York’s Indian reservations, with more registered off of the reservation, but within the county.  Likely a result of a choice between two different offices and simply which one they visited. 

Today, although the reservations certainly still exist, their Native population has shrunk considerably.  I’ve included information about each of New York’s Reservations below.  I must say that I’ve not found the smaller ones mentioned in the draft registrations, so  they probably didn’t have a separate registration office. 

In the descriptions of the Reservations below, you’ll notice the theme of gambling, tax free tobacco products and gasoline.  While many tribes have opened casinos and other forms of gaming, the jury is certainly out on whether the long term effects, economically, culturally and socially will be more positive or negative.  The opinions of the Native people themselves, as evidence by the commentary about the chiefs being divided, are split on the topic as well. 

All things considered, I must say that it’s somewhat karmic that the Indians, through casinos, are profiting from the vices of others, given that much of what they lost can be attributed at least in part to their attraction to the white man’s “fire water.”

1.  The Allegany Reservation (Uhì·yaʼ in Tuscarora) is an American Indian reservation in Cattaraugus County, New York, United States. The population was 1,020 at the 2010 census. The reservation is primarily occupied by members of the Seneca of the Iroquois, but a smaller number of Cayuga, another Iroquois tribe, also reside there. Historically, the reservation’s land was home to the Wenrohronon, whom the Senecas eliminated during the Beaver Wars in the 1650s.

2.  The Cattaraugus Reservation is an Indian reservation of the Seneca Indian Nation of the Iroquois Confederacy located in New York. As of the 2000 census, the Indian reservation had a total population of 2,412. Its total area is about 34.4 mi. It is divided among three counties for census purposes: Cattaraugus County, Chautauqua County and  Erie County

The reservation stretches from Lake Erie inward along Cattaraugus Creek, along either side of NY 438.  Interstate 90 crosses through the reservation with the closest exit being in Irving, New York.  The tribe has a Bingo Hall with a Poker Room and various video slot machines.

The reservation is mostly rural, with one-family homes along Route 438 interspersed with businesses such as tobacco shops and is divided into several communities such as Newtown, Bucktown, Pinewoods, Eleven Acres, Ozarks and Indian Hill.

3.  The Oil Springs Reservation is an Indian reservation of the Seneca tribe located in New York, USA. As of the 2010 census, the Indian reservation had one resident. Although the reservation is controlled by the Seneca tribe, as of 2005 no tribal members actually live on the Oil Springs Reservation. It is divided between two counties: Allegany County and Cattaraugus County. The reservation is northwest of the village of Cuba and includes a couple of Native owned gas stations.

The petroleum-tainted water of the spring was used for the natives medicinally and was known to Jesuit missionaries as early as the 17th century.

4.  The Oneida (Onyota’a:ka or Onayotekaono, meaning the People of the Upright Stone, or standing stone, Thwahrù·nęʼ in Tuscarora) are a Native American/First Nations (Canada) people and are one of the five founding nations of the Iroquois Confederacy in the area of upstate New York.  They own lands in Madison and Oneida Counties, although there is debate as to whether, because they once sold the land, it can be considered as “ancient tribal land” today.  The status of the land affects the tribes ability to open casinos and participate in gaming, otherwise illegal in New York.

The Iroquois call themselves Haudenosaunee (“The people of the longhouses”) in reference to their communal lifestyle and the construction of their dwellings.  Originally the Oneida inhabited the area that later became central New York, particularly around Oneida Lake and Oneida County.

5.  The Onondaga Reservation is an Indian reservation in Onondaga County, New York, United States. It is the territory of the Onondaga Nation. The population was 468 at the 2010 census.

The Onondaga Reservation is a politically independent entity, as the nation is federally recognized by the United States government.

6.  The Poospatuck Reservation is an Indian reservation in the community of Mastic, Suffolk County, New York, United States. The population was 271 at the 2000 census.

The reservation is the smallest in New York State. It is located in Mastic on the north side of Poospatuck Creek, on the east side of Poospatuck Lane, and south of Eleanor Avenue. Poospatuck is situated in the southeast corner of Suffolk County’s Town of Brookhaven; and is the township’s sole Indian reservation. It’s about 70 miles or 1½ hours from New York City.

The reservation is recognized by the state of New York but not the Bureau of Indian Affairs – an important difference in the debate over Indian gaming.

7.  The St. Regis Mohawk Reservation is a Mohawk Indian reservation in Franklin County, New York, United States. It is also known by its Mohawk name, Akwesasne. The population was 3,288 at the 2010 census. The reservation is adjacent to the Akwesasne reserve in Ontario and Quebec. The Mohawk consider the entire community to be one unit. The reservation contains the villages of Hogansburg and St. Regis.

Under the terms of the Jay Treaty (1794), the Mohawk people may pass freely across the International Boundary. The two parts of the reservation are separated by the St. Lawrence River and the 45th parallel.

The Mohawk are one of the original Five Nations of the Iroquois, historically based in present-day New York, and the “Keepers of the Eastern Door”.

The reservation adopted gambling in the 1980s. It has caused deep controversy. Broadly speaking, the elected chiefs and the Warrior Society have supported gambling, while the traditional chiefs have opposed it. Today, the reservation is home to the Akwesasne Mohawk Casino and the Mohawk Bingo Palace.

The elected tribal governments on the New York and Canadian sides and the traditional chiefs of Akwesasne often work together as a “Tri-Council” concerning areas of shared interest, for example to negotiate land claims settlements.

The Mohawk Tribe views the reservation as a “sovereign nation,” but shares jurisdiction with the State of New York, the United States, and the Town of Bombay, in which it is located.

8.  The Shinnecock Reservation is an Indian reservation for members of the Shinnecock Indian Nation in the town of Southampton in Suffolk County, New York, United States. It lies on the east side of Shinnecock Bay on southeastern Long Island, near Tuckahoe, Shinnecock Hills, and the village of Southampton. The population was 504 as of the 2000 census.

On December 15, 2009, The New York Times reported an announcement by the Obama administration that the Shinnecock Indians on Long Island meet the criteria for federal recognition, signaling the end of a 30-year court battle. This will enable the tribe to move forward with its plans for a casino in New York City or its suburbs. The announcement all but assures that the 1,066-member Shinnecock Indian Nation will receive formal federal recognition, following a public-comment period of up to six months which must be held before the final order is issued. The reservation has been recognized by New York State but not the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs—a discrepancy which has defined the lines in proposals for the reservation to introduce Indian gaming.

9.  The Tonawanda Indian Reservation is an Indian reservation of the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians located in western New York, USA. The band is a federally recognized tribe and, in the 2010 census, had 483 people living on the reservation. Although most of the reservation lies in Genesee County, portions are within the boundaries of Erie and Niagara counties.

The Tonawanda Reservation is also known as the Tonawanda Creek Reservation. Currently, it has more than a half dozen businesses located on Bloomingdale Road within the reservation. Several sell untaxed, low-price cigarettes and gasoline. Other businesses sell Seneca craft goods, groceries, and prepared food.

After various cultures of indigenous peoples succeeded each other in the Great Lakes area, in historic times, the five nations of the Iroquois coalesced. Before the mid-17th century, they had formed the Iroquois Confederacy. The Seneca were one of the Five Nations of the Haudenosaunee.

During the American Revolutionary War, most of the Iroquois sided with the British, as they hoped to end colonial encroachment. After the war, most of the Seneca and other Iroquois were forced to cede their land to the US. They migrated with Joseph Brant and other Iroquois tribes to Ontario, Canada.

Those who stayed in New York were assigned reservations. The Tonawanda Band of Seneca Indians split from the rest of the tribe in the 19th century to preserve their traditional practices, including selection of life chiefs by heritage. The Seneca of this reservation worked with self-taught anthropologist Lewis H. Morgan in mid century to teach him about the Iroquois kinship and social structures.

He published the results of his work in 1851 as The League of the Ho-de-no-sau-nee or Iroquois. His insights about the significance and details of kinship structure in Native American societies influenced much following anthropological and ethnological research. Much of the information was provided by his colleague and friend Ely S. Parker, a Seneca born on the reservation in 1828. Morgan dedicated his book to Parker and credited him with their joint research.

10.  The Tuscarora Reservation (Nyučirhéʼę in Tuscarora) is an Indian reservation in Niagara County, New York. The population was 1,152 at the 2010 census. The Tuscarora are a federally recognized tribe and the Sixth Nation of the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois Confederacy active before the American Revolutionary War.

The Tuscarora tribe had migrated in ancient times from the New York area to the South, where they were based in the Carolinas. After extended conflict with European settlers and other Native Americans at the beginning of the 18th century and defeat in the Tuscarora War, most of the tribe migrated North, beginning in 1722.

They first located in the territory of the Oneida tribe in central New York. By the early 1800s, they declared their tribe fully relocated and said that remnant Tuscarora who stayed in the South would no longer be considered part of the tribe. The Tuscarora and Oneida became allies of the American Continental cause during the American Revolution, and of the United States during the War of 1812. During both wars, they suffered attacks by British armed forces and their First Nations allies in central New York. The Tuscarora were given land from the Seneca tribe (territory which they had taken from the Neutral Nation) in 1797. In 1803, the US government granted the Tuscarora a reservation in Niagara County.

In 1960, through the efforts of the powerful appointed official, Robert Moses of New York City, New York State seized 550 acres of the Tuscarora reservation to form a reservoir for the Robert Moses Niagara Power Plant operated by the New York Power Authority. New York needed 1,350 acres but only received 550 acres and had to pay $1,500 per acre per a United States Supreme Court Decision. This led to a displacement of tribal members and a serious disruption to their economy. After a lengthy court case and appeals, in 2003, the Power Authority agreed to compensate the tribe financially and return some unused land.

The reservation is a composite holding derived from (1) land given to the tribe the Seneca tribe, Land donated by the Holland Land Company, and (3) Trust territory held by the federal government.

In the draft registrations, we continually see the Lewiston Reservation mentioned.  What about Lewiston???

The Village of Lewiston, NY (also known as Yehęwakwáʼthaʼ in Tuscarora) is within the Town of Lewiston in Niagara County. The Earl W. Brydges Artpark State Park lies at its southern border.

Lewiston is situated on the Niagara River, just across the river from Canada. It is half way between the world-famous Niagara Falls and historic Fort Niagara in Youngstown, New York. Niagara Falls is about a ten-minute drive to the south. Visitors from Canada can take the Lewiston-Queenston Bridge across the Niagara River.

Various cultures of Native American tribes inhabited the Lewiston area for thousands of years, with the earliest known artifacts dating to 5000 B.C. By the 14th century, this area was inhabited by Iroquoian-speaking peoples. Before the mid-17th century, they had coalesced into the Five Nations, the historic Iroquois tribes of the Haudenosaunee based in present-day New York. In the early 18th century, they were joined by the Iroquoian Tuscarora from the South, who centuries before had migrated from the Great Lakes area to North Carolina. In 1722, the Iroquois accepted the Tuscarora as the Sixth Nation of the confederacy. The Tuscarora had a village here before the American Revolutionary War called Yehęwakwáʼthaʼ.

During the war, Tuscarora and Oneida Iroquois bands allied individually with the colonists or the British. Those who allied with the British went north with Joseph Brant before the end of the war and are part of the Six Nations of the Grand River First Nation in Ontario. Those allied with the American colonists stayed in New York. The Tuscarora Nation of New York is federally recognized and has occupied a reservation at Lewiston since the early 19th Century, although in the 1950s state and federal authorities took 22% of their reservation by eminent domain to construct what is now the Robert Moses Power Plant reservoir.

In addition to its ancient indigenous settlement, Lewiston became historically significant during European development of North America, and strategic in United States and Canadian history. It was the site from which the US invaded Canada in the Battle of Queenston Heights which took place October 13, 1812. It was the first major battle of the War of 1812. A commemorative sign marks the location where the American force embarked to cross the Niagara River. After the Americans lost the battle, a British retaliatory raid in December 1813 burned Lewiston to the ground and killed several civilians. While most American militia deserted, the local Tuscarora natives stood and fought a delaying action which bought enough time for the surviving citizens to escape, although their own village was burned as a result. The Historical Association has announced plans to construct a large scale bronze monument of thanksgiving to the Tuscaroras entitled “Tuscarora Heroes” to be unveiled on the 200th anniversary of the attack on December 19, 2013.

Posted in Iroquois, Mohawk, New York, Oneida, Onondaga, Poospatuck, Seneca, Shinnecock, Tuscarora | 39 Comments